Interesting chart.
The way we define ‘inflation’ seems to be largely based on ‘cost plus’ pricing, seems?

10 Responses

      1. uk has a big trade deficit, plus a large population for such a small piece of land (i.e. it’s dependent on imports of basics such as food).

        Eurozone has a balanced current account overall. US has a mighty current account deficit but has the dollar and is not dependent on food imports.

      2. @y,

        Trade deficit has little to do with it. Food contributes 0.25% of the 12 month figure.

        Gas, electricity and rent is 0.5% and restaurants and hotels is 0.4%.

        And underlying most of that are monopoly rents – largely land.

        The UK is no longer a nation of shopkeepers, but a nation of landlords. The shopkeepers can no longer afford the rent.

        It’s the small bit of land owned by a few Barons and rented to the rest that’s the problem.

        Amusingly it’s always been like that, and I suspect we’ll celebrate the 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta with it still being like that.

      3. @y,

        Supply side push through on oil and power prices – from the return of the value of the pound to mid 1990s relative valuations after the crash. Producer inflation was massive and it took ages to feed through to price hikes at the consumer end.

        The UK had a 10 year currency valuation bubble that ended up turning a load of our factories into lousy box cupboards for people to live in. That’s what ‘strong currency’ policies do to your economy.

      4. @y, the 2011 spike was VAT related I thought – Treasury upped vat so it spiked the inflation data for one year.

      5. “That’s what ‘strong currency’ policies do to your economy.”

        What about Switzerland?

Leave a Reply