16 Responses

      1. @Walid M,

        I agree, elite bankers and Control Frauds are mean, but it’s not clear that we’re reverting to their dominance. Rather, we’re entering uncharted territory.

        🙂

      2. @Walid M,
        Workforce participation increased as more women joined the workforce, partly because they were “liberated,” and partly because wage suppression meant that it took two incomes to maintain the standard of living that used to be achieved with only one income.

        The sharp drop in workforce participation after the 2008 crash was obviously due to the economy, not to evolving social or demographic issues.

        I like these participation charts because they don’t hide the discouraged workers like the headline unemployment number.

    1. @Neil Wilson,

      Amusingly it’s easier to find the definition of Civilian Employment-Population Ratio using the Google, than it is to find the definition of ILO unemployed.
      And I don’t know why anyone would count engaged and not betrothed.

      For more fun there’s also:
      http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000/

      But the above graph really is employed people/population. Where you only count people 16 and older who are not institutionalized.

Leave a Reply to Wekasus Cancel reply